|
System of Linear
Equations
| |
| A
system of
linear equations in
unknowns is given as : |
| |
| a11 x1 + a12 x2 + . . . . . .
a1n xn = b1 |
|
| a21 x1 + a22 x2 + . . . . . .
a2n xn = b2 |
| :
: |
| :
: |
| am1 x1 + am2 x2 + . . . . . .
amn xn = bm |
| The
system can be conveniently written in matrix form as |
A x = b
|
|
| by
putting A = [ aij
] , x = [ x1 x2 . . . . .
xn ] T and b =
[ b1 b2 . . . . . bm ] T |
|
| The
system A x = b is
said to be consistent if it has a solution. (see Example
1 & Example
2) |
| It
is said to be inconsistent if it has no solution. (see Example
3) |
|
| |
| Example
1 : |
The
following equation 2x1- x2 = 3 |
|
is
consistent because as x1=
2 , x2 = 1 |
|
In
fact, there are infinitely many sets of solutions : |
|
|
|
|
| Example
2 : |
The
following system of equations |
|
2x1- x2 = 3 |
|
x1- x2 = 1 |
|
is
consistent and has uniqtue soluion [ x1
x2 ] T = [ 2 1
] T. |
|
|
| Example
3 : |
The
following system of equations |
|
2x1- x2 = 3 |
|
-x1+ 0.5x2 = 2 |
|
is
inconsistent because no value of xi
can satisfy the system. |
|
|
| I.
Reduced Row Echelon Form |
| An m
x n matrix
is said to be in reduced row echelon form ( see Example
4 ) when |
| (a) |
all rows consisting entirely zeros, if any, are at the bottom
of the matrix; and |
|
| (b) |
the first nonzero entry in each row is equal to 1 (called the
leading entry); and |
|
| (c) |
if rows i and i +1
are two successive rows that do not consist entirely of zeros |
|
then the leading entry of row i +1
is to the right of the leading enrtry of row i; |
|
and |
|
| (d) |
if a column contains a leading entry of some row, then all other
entries in that |
|
column are zeros. |
|
Note:
A matrix satisfies only (a), (b) and (c) is said to be in row echelon
form.
(see Example
5) |
| Example
4 : |
The
following matrices are in reduced row echelon form |
|
,
|
|
|
| Example
5 : |
The
following matrices are in row echelon form |
|
A
= , B
=
|
|
|
|
|
Question A |
|
Matrix A is not a reduced row echelon form
because : |
  |
  |
  |
|
|
|
|
|
Question B |
|
Matrix
B is not a reduced row echelon form because : |
  |
  |
|
|
|
| Example
6 : |
| The following
matrices is neither a reduced row echelon form nor
|
| a row echelon
form |
|
|
C
=
, D =
|
|
|
| Note : |
A matrix
can be transformed to reduced row echelon form |
|
by applying
the elementary row operation. |
| III.
Gaussian Elimination Method |
| Consider
the linear system A x = b
and its augmented matrix [ A
| b ] . |
| If,
by a sequence of elementary row operations, [ A
| b ] is reduced to |
| [
A' | b' ] such that
A' is in row-echelon form, then the
equivalent system |
| A'
x = b' can be solved by some simple
steps. This method is called the |
| Gaussian
Elimination. |
|
| Example 8 : |
| The
linear system
|
-x1
+ x2 - 4x3 =
-10 |
| 3x1
+ 2x2
= 1 |
| 2x1
+ 3x2 - 2x3 =
3 |
|
|
has
augmented matrix  |
|
| which
can be reduced
|
|
| by
the elementary row |
| operations
to |
|
|
| This
is equivalent to |
x1
- x2 + 4x3
= 10 |
|
x2 - 2.4x3 =
- 5.8 |
|
x3 = 6 |
|
|
Thus
we obtain x = [ - 6.4
7.6 6 ] T
as the only solution. |
| IV.
Gauss-Jordan Method |
| If the linear
system A x = b
and its augmented matrix [ A
| b ] is reduced |
| to
[ R | C ] , such
that R is in reduced row-echelon form, by elementary row |
| operations,
then the solutionof the equivalent system R
x = C can be |
| obtained
easily. This is called the Gauss - Jordan Method. |
|
|